Legal Opinion

McGowan v. Armour

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 26, 1918No. 4892PublishedCited by 13 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of South Dakota; James D. Elliott, Judge. Action by Clara T. Armour against Mabel Estelle McGowan. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

AMIDON, District Judge.

This is an action at law by Clara T. Armour for alienation of her husband’s affections, brought against Mabel Estelle McGowan as defendant. It resulted in a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $25,000. On condition that a new trial would otherwise be granted, the-court wás authorized to reduce this to $10,-000. Judgment was entered for lhat amount, to review which defendant brings error.

Plaintiff and her husband were itinerant mattress cleaners. The husband had been addicted to the excessive use of intoxicating liquors, going on protracted sprees from time to time. He had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hardwick v. HardwickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Consolidated Grocery Co. v. HammondCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1910

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. NataleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Hartzell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. Wallace v. WallaceMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Nicola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
  5. Pugsley v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API