Legal Opinion

Lockard v. Murphy Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 10, 1980No. 78-4148, CA 16347PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

This is a personal injury action. The issue before this court is whether, under the terms of the Workers’ Compensation Law, the plaintiff is an employe of defendant and thus barred from maintaining this action, ORS 656.018, 1 or whether he is an independent contractor. Alternatively to his contention that he is an independent contractor, plaintiff contends that he is a sole proprietor and thus excluded from coverage under the act, ORS 656.027(7). 2 The trial court, on cross-motions for summary judgment, found that the plaintiff was an employe and entered summary judgment for the defendant. We…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Bowser v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Collins v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Carlile v. GreeningerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Louvring v. Excel Logging Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008
  2. HDG Enterprises, Inc. v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Little Donkey Enterprises, Inc. v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Little Donkey Enterprises, Inc. v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. In re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API