Legal Opinion

Little Donkey Enterprises, Inc. v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 29, 1991No. 88-11-01; CA A63546PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Petitioner seeks review of the final order of the Department of Insurance and Finance that ordered petitioner to pay workers’ compensation premiums assessed by SAIF. We review for substantial evidence and errors of law, ORS 183.480; ORS 183.482, and conclude that substantial evidence supports the department’s factual findings and that it did not err in determining that the workers in question are employees rather than independent contractors. However, the department failed to consider whether those employees are exempt as non-subject workers under ORS 656.027.

Petitioner argues that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lockard v. Murphy Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. Bernards v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Little Donkey Enterprises, Inc. v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Reforestation General Contractors, Inc. v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. S-W Floor Cover Shop v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Little Donkey Enterprises, Inc. v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Bob Wilkes Falling, Inc. v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API