Legal Opinion

Harp v. Harp

California Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1902No. Sac. No. 977PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Action to have a deed declared to he a mortgage, and that defendant reconvey on full payment of the debt and cost of conveyance. Certain special questions were submitted to a jury and were answered favorably to plaintiff, and upon the verdict and findings of the court plaintiff had judgment, from which and from the order denying his motion for a new trial defendant appeals.

Defendant is administrator of the estate of J. D. Harp, deceased, who in his lifetime was plaintiff’s father. It appears that having reached the age of seventy years, and wishing to free himself from the care of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Mahoney v. BostwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Sherman v. SandellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Ross v. BrusieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Wormouth v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gray v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Hudson v. WylieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  3. Ralph v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Hudson v. WylieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. Davis v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API