Legal Opinion

Swan v. Thompson

California Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1899No. S. F. No. 1124PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a new trial. S. K. Dougherty. Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

By this action it is sought to recover damages from defendant upon the grounds of slander and malicious prosecution. Plaintiff is a master mariner, and was for several 3rears a part owner in the good ship “AícHear,” and had command of her. Defendant was also a part owner in the ship, and managing owner.

The claim for damages is based upon two grounds: 1. It is charged that the defendant declared of plaintiff, in the presence of certain people comprising a committee representing certain insurance companies, that “he is a drunkard -when he is away from town.” It is further charged by the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sanderson v. . CaldwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Wilson v. FitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Childers v. San Jose Mercury Printing & Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Hearne v. De YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Crocker v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Stevens v. SnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Bates v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. International Harvester Co. of America v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Crouch v. National Livestock Remedy Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API