Legal Opinion
Crouch v. National Livestock Remedy Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided January 17, 1928PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.
-I. The appellant H. C. Moorinan is engaged
in the business of manufacturing live-stock remedies, under the name and style of "National Livestock Remedy Company (not Inc.)." The principal place of business is in Chicago. Said company sold its products directly to the consumer, through agents; and one L. A. (Lute) Meyers, of Webster City, Iowa, was such a salesman.
Service of the original notice in this cause was had upon Meyers, he beiiig described in the i~eturn of service as "agent of said corporation." The appellants entered a special appearance, and by motion attacked the jurisdiction of…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Turner v. . City of NewburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Tooley v. . BaconNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Davis v. Van Camp Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Lindquist v. Des Moines Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Meeker v. City of ClintonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Ellis v. LindmarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.