Breniman v. Agricultural Consultants, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DUBOFSKY.
Defendant Agricultural Consultants, Inc., (ACI) appeals the judgment entered after a bench trial requiring it to pay to plaintiff, George Breniman, $59,713.29, which represents the amount he demanded for his preferred stock in an April 24, 1986, letter. Plaintiff also brought a separate stockholder derivative claim against defendants Dean and Natalie Lansing and AER, Inc. for “looting.” The trial court dismissed this action. We affirm.
I
Defendant argues that the fixed redemption value of its preferred stock is a *495contractually agreed upon amount which prevents plaintiff…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Voeller v. Neilston Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Harry Lewis v. Earle A. Chiles, Howard Burnett, Virgil Campbell, Earl M. Chiles, Cyril K. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Colorado Society of Community & Institutional Psychologists, Inc. v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- STATE, COMM'R OF TRANSP. v. Cooper Alloy Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pueblo Bancorporation v. Lindoe, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Willard v. Moneta Building Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- South Dakota Board of Nursing v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- M Life Insurance Co. v. Sapers & Wallack Insurance Agency, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- WCM Industries, Inc. v. Trustees of the Harold G. Wilson 1985 Revocable TrustColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.