Legal Opinion

Willard v. Moneta Building Supply, Inc.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 14, 2001No. Record 002354PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lemons

In this appeal, we consider whether Ronald L. Willard’s (“Willard”) cause of action against Moneta Building Supply, Inc. (“Moneta”) is governed by the five-year statute of limitations set forth in Code § 8.01-243(B) or by the two-year statute of limitations set forth in Code § 8.01-248. Specifically, we must decide whether a loss of dissenters’ rights to demand payment for shares of stock constitutes an injury to property.

I. Facts and Proceedings Below

Willard previously filed a derivative action pursuant to Code § 13.1-672.1 on behalf of Moneta and all its stockholders against Moneta, A.S.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sensenbrenner v. Rust, Orling & Neale, Architects, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  2. Carwile v. Richmond Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  3. Richmond Redevelopment & Housing Authority v. Laburnum Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  4. First Virginia Bank-Colonial v. BakerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  5. Ward v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Filak v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  2. Conger v. BarrettSupreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  3. Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. HornSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
  4. Simon v. ForerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  5. William H. Gordon Assocs., Inc. v. Heritage FellowshipSupreme Court of Virginia · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API