Central Labor Council of Tacoma v. Young
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
— The respondent and appellants entered into contract looking to the holding of a Labor Day celebration. The contract provided for the sale of coupon tickets entitling purchasers to chances on prizes. It may be taken as being conceded that the contract was invalid as violative of Art. I, § 24, of the state constitution, and Rem. Comp. Stat., § 2464, in that it provided for the holding of a lottery. After the celebration on September 5, 1921, the respondent and appellants met for the purpose of settling up their affairs, and a final accounting was reached whereby it was determined and agreed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McDonald v. LundWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Daniel v. DanielWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Stirtan v. BlethenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Murphey v. Springs & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1912
- Standard Furniture Co. v. Van AlstineWashington Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by10 opinions
- Denning v. TaberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Golberg v. SanglierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Brougham v. SwarvaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Sherwood & Roberts-Yakima, Inc. v. CohanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Melton v. United Retail MerchantsWashington Supreme Court · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.