Legal Opinion

Standard Furniture Co. v. Van Alstine

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1903No. 4466PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Boyd J. Talliian, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mount, J.

— Action in equity to restrain the collection of a judgment at law. Plaintiff had judgment below. Defendants appeal.

The judgment appealed from restrained the levy of an execution issued upon a judgment of nonsuit in an action for replevin, wherein a judgment was rendered against respondent and in favor of the appellant Van Alstine, for the return of certain goods' or their value, $800. The facts are not disputed and are substantially as follows: On May 14-, 1898, Lou Mehaffey and Eiuma Horton were conducting a house of prostitution in the city…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CoatesWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. McDonald v. LundWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Hodson v. McConnelIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Standard Furniture Co. v. Van AlstineWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Matter v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Daniel v. DanielWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Melton v. United Retail MerchantsWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Central Labor Council of Tacoma v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Sanger Lumber Co. v. Western Lumber ExchangeWashington Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API