Legal Opinion

Motley-Motley, Inc. v. Pollution Control Hearings Board

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 19, 2005No. 22580-1-IIIPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*67¶1 This case concerns relinquishment of a right to divert surface water from the Palouse River. In 1996, after receiving information that the water right had not been used since the early 1970s, the Department of Ecology (DOE) issued an order initiating proceedings to relinquish the water right. The Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) issued a final order affirming DOE’s tentative order that the water right to the property had been relinquished because it had not been used for a five-year period.

Kurtz, J. —

¶2 Motley-Motley, Inc. (Motley), had purchased the land and its pertinent water…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Ancheta v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd.Washington Supreme Court · 2000

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Cornelius v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Lang v. Dental Quality Assurance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Pacific Land Partners, LLC v. Department of EcologyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Pacific Land Partners, LLC v. Dept. of EcologyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Fort v. STATE, DEPT. OF ECOLOGYCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API