Stevens v. Bispham
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
Plaintiffs William Stevens and Janice Stevens brought this action against William’s former criminal defense attorney. William alleged legal malpractice, and Janice, his wife, alleged loss of consortium. William appeals from a summary judgment that was based on his failure to file his complaint within the time required by the Statute of Limitations.1 ORS 12.110(1). Defendant purports to cross-assign error to the denial of his motion for summary judgment against Janice. We reyerse the summary judgment against William and otherwise affirm.
The court appointed defendant to represent William on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Artman v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Melgard v. HannaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Stromme v. Nasburg and Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Sandgathe v. JaggerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Barnard v. LannanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Moore-Reed v. GriffinOregon Supreme Court · 2025
- Moore-Reed v. GriffinOregon Supreme Court · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.