Legal Opinion

Norman Properties v. Bozeman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 2, 1990No. 88-406PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case involves claims by the plaintiffs based on alleged fraud and breach of the warranty of habitability of a new house; the case arises out of the purchase of a new house in Fort Deposit, Alabama. Robert Dwayne and Elizabeth H. Bozeman sued John and Peter Norman and their wives, Genie and Delnora Norman, individually. They later amended their complaint to add as a defendant Norman Properties, a partnership composed of John and Peter Norman. The complaint requested compensatory damages as well as damages for mental and emotional anguish.

The jury returned a verdict against Norman…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Hickox v. StoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. B & M HOMES, INC. v. HoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Bank of Red Bay v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Johnson v. Shenandoah Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  5. Mrs. Harvey Stancill v. McKenzie Tank Lines, Inc., and Carriers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Norman v. BozemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Smith v. ReddMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Barnes v. OswaltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Winston & Strawn LLP v. the Law Firm of John Arthur EavesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. Chenault v. JamisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API