Legal Opinion
Chenault v. Jamison
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 19, 1991No. 89-1402PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING
This Court's original opinion of January 11, 1991, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor.
This case concerns a breach of an alleged partnership agreement. The appellants, Bob Bone and Ben Chenault, claim that John W. Jamison III, individually, breached the alleged partnership agreement and breached the fiduciary duty of honesty and fair dealing between partners when he failed to include them in a project to develop real estate. in Boaz.
Jamison is chairman of the board of Capital Resources Corporation, Inc., and George Bonfanti is the president. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Krivo Industrial Supply Company and Morgan Precision Parts, Inc. v. National Distillers and Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Cohen v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- McCrary v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Wood v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Silicone Gel Breast Implants Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1993
- Gilbert v. James Russell Motors, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- M & M Wholesale Florist, Inc. v. EmmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- In Re Birmingham Asbestos LitigationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- In Re Birmingham Asbestos LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.