Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Oswalt

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 11, 1991No. 89-1640PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case involves claims for damages based on personal injury and wrongful death. The issue is whether the trial court erred in denying the plaintiff's motion for new trial; that motion asserts that the jury verdict for the plaintiff on his personal injury claim and its verdict for the defendant on the plaintiff's wrongful death claim are inconsistent. We agree that the verdicts are inconsistent, and we reverse and remand.

Bobby D. Barnes ("Barnes"), individually and as administrator of the estate of Nora Lee Barnes, his deceased wife, sued the estate of William Oswalt ("Oswalt") for damages…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shirley v. ShirleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Smith v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Stinson v. Acme Propane Gas Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Underwriters Nat'l Assur. Co. v. PoseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. Board of Trustees of University of Ala. v. HarrellAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mobile Infirmary Medical Center v. HodgenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Altosino v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. King v. National Spa and Pool InstituteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. UNION MORTG. CO., INC. v. BarlowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. HUMANA MED. OF ALA. v. TraffanstedtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API