Legal Opinion

Holton v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1910PublishedCited by 23 opinions

'Appeal by defendant from Gouncill, J., at December Term, 1909, of Pamlico. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtClaRK, C. J.

Tbe plaintiff bad been employed by tbe defendant for two weeks in its sawmill, as a common laborer. He was a young man without experience in tbe use of machinery. Tbe foreman then sent for tbe plaintiff and told him that a workman around tbe machinery bad been discharged and be wanted tbe plaintiff to help Hadder, the chief oiler, and to do whatever Hadder told him to do. Plaintiff testified: “Hadder told me bow to oil tbe machinery, and after I bad been there two or three days Hadder told me to raise tbe hood of tbe ‘bog’ and sharpen tbe knives; be said that if I knew bow, I could throw tbe…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dorsett v. Clement-Ross Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  2. Avery v. West Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Noble v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. Marks v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Craven Ex Rel. Craven v. Worth Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Pigford v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Davis v. North Carolina Shipbuilding Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. Steeley v. Dare Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Thompson v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Crisp v. Hanover Thread Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API