Crisp v. Hanover Thread Mills, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
The only question involved is whether, on all the evidence, taken, as in a case of nonsuit, most favorable to plaintiff, the court below should have granted a nonsuit at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence.
Tbe plaintiff’s contention was tbat tbe defendant furnished and required him to use a box for tbe purpose of carrying out spools from tbe thread machine which was too cumbrous and heavy for one man to lift and carry, and negligently failed to furnish him with a helper to do the work; that defendant knew the situation, and plaintiff informed the defendant’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Smith v. Proctor.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Pigford v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Tanner v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Pressly v. Yarn Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Proctor v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Clinard v. . Electric Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- West v. . Mining CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Proctor v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Jarvis v. Erwin Cotton Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.