Legal Opinion

Noble v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 29, 1909PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Qoohe, J., April Term, 1909, of CeaveN. Civil action to recover damages for personal injury received by plaintiff while working in defendant’s mill. Tbe usual issues of negligence, contributory negligence and damage were submitted. From a verdict and judgment for plaintiff tbe defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The uncontradicted evidence in this case tends to prove these facts. Plaintiff was injured in November, 1906, while feeding the planing mill. He was working under one Chapman, who was the foreman of the machine. A shiver of wood, became fastened under the guide. It was necessary to remove this. The grader, who was present, called plaintiff’s attention to the fact that there was a streak on the board, caused by the shiver. Plaintiff shut the feed off and went to remove the shiver. The company did not furnish any appliance of any kind for removing such shivers of wood. It was customary to pick…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tanner v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Avery v. West Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Pigford v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Swaney v. Peden Steel CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Davis v. North Carolina Shipbuilding Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Holton v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. Thompson v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API