Legal Opinion

Umpleby v. Dorsey

Stark County Court of Common Pleas

Decided April 24, 1967No. 110535PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPutman, J.

The plaintiff is a married woman who claims that her policeman-husband was seriously injured in the line of duty by the defendant negligently strildng him with an automobile.

She alleges that “prior to receiving the foregoing injuries, plaintiff’s husband was 29 years of age, a husband and father, and in sound physical condition. As a result of the injuries to plaintiff’s husband, he was and has been unable to perform .many of the family duties as before. Plaintiff says further that she has been deprived of the love, services, conjugal relations and consortium of her husband, all due to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Schneider v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Clem v. BrownPaulding County Court of Common Pleas · 1965

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gates v. FoleySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Clouston v. Remlinger Oldsmobile Cadillac, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Hastings Ex Rel. Hastings v. James River Aerie No. 2337North Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Steinmetz v. Dworkin Truck Lines, Inc.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1968
  5. Copeland v. SMITH DAIRY PRODUCTS COMPANYDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API