Legal Opinion

Hastings Ex Rel. Hastings v. James River Aerie No. 2337

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1976No. Civ. 9247PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

In this case, Mary E. Hastings, as the wife of Norman R. Hastings, and Karen E. Hastings, the daughter of Mary and Norman, through her mother as next friend, bring an action under our Dram Shop Act, Section 5-01-06, N.D.C.C. Their action is to recover damages from three licensed liquor dealers in the City of Jamestown, *749North Dakota, for their sale or gift of alcoholic beverages to Mr. Hastings when he was intoxicated. They allege that this caused him to be convicted of the crime of second degree murder in the shooting death of one Evangeline Opp, resulting in his…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Labine v. VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Johnson v. HassettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Foot v. CardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
  4. Hoffman v. DautelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. Lembke v. UnkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. First Trust Co. of North Dakota v. Scheels Hardware & Sports Shop, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gail v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  3. Salin v. KloempkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State Ex Rel. Olson v. MaxwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Aanenson v. BastienNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API