Legal Opinion
Copeland v. SMITH DAIRY PRODUCTS COMPANY
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 5, 1968No. Civ. A. C 67-910PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WILLIAM K. THOMAS, District Judge.
Defendants move to dismiss plaintiff Ardell Copeland’s second cause of action. Growing out of an automobile accident of December 14, 1965 Elmer Copeland and Ardell Copeland have filed their complaint against defendants (Smith companies) and their truck driver, in which damages are claimed due to defendants’ negligence. In the first cause of action plaintiff Elmer Copeland claims that he sustained personal injuries, including a permanent loss of a portion of his sexual capacity. In the second cause of action, while making no claim of personal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Deems v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Clem v. BrownPaulding County Court of Common Pleas · 1965
- Curry v. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
- Umpleby v. DorseyStark County Court of Common Pleas · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clouston v. Remlinger Oldsmobile Cadillac, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
- Phyllis Neyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Steinmetz v. Dworkin Truck Lines, Inc.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1968