Legal Opinion
Ramey v. Fassoulas
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 8, 1982No. 79-1573PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
414 So.2d 198 (1982)
Dr. John R. RAMEY and Manson, Kuckku and Middkiff, P.A., Individually, and d/b/a Manson Clinic, Appellants,
v.
John FASSOULAS and Edith Fassoulas, Individually and As Husband and Wife, Appellees.
No. 79-1573.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
February 23, 1982.
On Rehearing June 8, 1982.
Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Davant, Tutan, O'Hara & McCoy and Richard A. Sherman, Miami, for appellants.
Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Hawkesworth & Schmick, Miami, for appellees.
Before HUBBART, C.J., HENDRY, J., and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Ret.), Associate Judge.
HUBBA…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Troppi v. ScarfMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Coleman v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
- Sherlock v. Stillwater ClinicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Bowman v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fassoulas v. RameySupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Keel v. BanachSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Ash v. Coconut Grove BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984