Legal Opinion

Fassoulas v. Ramey

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 19, 1984No. 62220PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

450 So.2d 822 (1984)

John FASSOULAS, et al., Petitioners,

v.

John R. RAMEY, et al., Respondents.

No. 62220.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January 19, 1984.

Rehearing Denied June 21, 1984.

Arnold R. Ginsberg of Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, and Hawkesworth & Schmick, Miami, for petitioners.

Richard A. Sherman, Fort Lauderdale, and Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Tutan, O'Hara, McCoy, Graham & Lane, Miami, for respondents.

2Per curiam

This cause is before the Court on a decision certified by the Third District Court of Appeal as passing upon a question of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Hoffman v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  5. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by50 opinions

  1. Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. RappSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. Kush v. LloydSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. Smith v. GoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Blake v. CruzIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Soto Cabral v. Estado Libre AsociadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1995

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API