Ahern v. Shinseki
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
In the last half-century, Congress has enacted a safety net of antidiscrimination laws designed to protect workers’ rights. These laws serve salutary purposes, but they are not intended to function as a collective panacea for every work-related experience that is in some respect unjust, unfair, or unpleasant. This case, which involves the introduction of an abrasive supervisor into a workplace accustomed to a kinder, gentler way of doing business, illustrates the point.
The underlying dispute takes the form of an action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by197 opinions
- Calero-Cerezo v. U.S. Dep of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Morales-Cruz v. University of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Gerald v. University of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Hannon v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- González-Droz v. González-ColónCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
192 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.