Legal Opinion

Ahern v. Shinseki

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 13, 2010No. 09-1985PublishedCited by 197 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

In the last half-century, Congress has enacted a safety net of antidiscrimination laws designed to protect workers’ rights. These laws serve salutary purposes, but they are not intended to function as a collective panacea for every work-related experience that is in some respect unjust, unfair, or unpleasant. This case, which involves the introduction of an abrasive supervisor into a workplace accustomed to a kinder, gentler way of doing business, illustrates the point.

The underlying dispute takes the form of an action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by197 opinions

  1. Calero-Cerezo v. U.S. Dep of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  2. Morales-Cruz v. University of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  3. Gerald v. University of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  4. Hannon v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  5. González-Droz v. González-ColónCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011

192 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API