Legal Opinion

Indianapolis Natural Gas Co. v. Kibbey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1893No. 16,400PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Madison. Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

This was a suit brought by the appellee for injunction. A demurrer to the complaint was overruled; and the appellant declining to plead further, judgment was rendered in favor of the appellee, enjoining the appellant from drilling a gas well in the premises described in the complaint.

The appellee, as assignee, claimed title to the gas lands in question, under the following contract:

' 'This agreement, made and entered into this 26th day of September, 1889, by and between Mary E. Neece and W. S. Neece, of the first part, and O. F. Deal, of the second part, witnesseth: That the parties of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Midland Railway Co. v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Harlan v. Logansport Natural Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hastings Oil Co. v. Texas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Burke v. MeadIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Gillespie v. Fulton Oil & Gas Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Consumers Gas Trust Co. v. American Plate Glass Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. State ex rel. KetchamIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API