Legal Opinion
People v. Clark
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided January 11, 2008PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order reversed on the law, defendant’s motion to suppress evidence denied and matter remitted to the court below for all further proceedings.
Defendant was charged with two counts of endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law § 260.10 [1], [2]). The child is an eight-year-old boy suffering from autism, who does not speak and inflicts bodily harm upon himself. He requires special bus transportation to and from school, and the services of defendant, his personal bus matron. When the child’s mother noticed that her son was coming home with bruises and abnormal…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Riley v. County of BroomeNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Sheehy v. Big Flats Community Day, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Hechter v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. WhitnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- The People v. Anthony BadalamentiNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. K.B.New York Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. PolingHocking County Municipal Court · 2010
- The People v. Anthony BadalamentiNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.