Legal Opinion · Dissent

The People v. Anthony Badalamenti

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 2016No. 71Published

1DissentStein, J.

The majority holds, in the face of statutes that are silent on the subject, that a parent may vicariously consent for a minor child for the purposes of satisfying the one-party consent requirement contained in New York’s eavesdropping statutes. In so holding, the majority disregards settled principles of statutory interpretation and encroaches on the province of the legislature. I, therefore, dissent.

I

Defendant was charged with criminal possession of a weapon and assaulting his girlfriend’s six-year-old child, either individually or by aiding and abetting the child’s mother, after the child…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Riley v. County of BroomeNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. FinneganNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. TychanskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. People v. BasilicatoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API