Legal Opinion

Riley v. County of Broome

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 2000PublishedCited by 296 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Kaye.

These appeals call upon us to do what increasingly is asked of courts in this age of statutes: interpret the words of a legislative enactment which the contesting parties construe differently. In particular, we are asked whether Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1103 (b) exempts statutorily defined “hazard vehicles” engaged in highway work from the “rules of the road,” and whether it limits the liability of their owners and operators to reckless disregard for the safety of others. We conclude that defendants correctly read the statute, and we hold — as did the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Saarinen v. KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Washington Post Co. v. New York State Insurance DepartmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. New York State Bankers Ass'n v. AlbrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Farley v. . the Mayor, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Ottmann v. Village of Rockville CentreNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by296 opinions

  1. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. SpitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Kabir v. County of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Criscione v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. MATTER OF THEROUX v. ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Tantaros v. Fox News Network, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021

291 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API