H.R. Options, Inc. v. Zaino
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
{¶ 1} H.R. Options, Inc. (“HRO”) is a California-based human resources firm that provides third-party employment services for its clients. HRO serves as the employer of record for persons whose services its clients want to utilize but whom the clients do not want to hire as employees or as independent contractors. By having HRO hire the desired personnel and furnish them for the clients’ use, the clients are able to avoid various potential tax and pension problems. HRO hires persons referred to it by the clients, puts them on its own payroll, and provides them for use by its clients.
{¶ 2} HRO…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Moore Personnel Services, Inc. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Mid-States Terminal, Inc. v. Lucas County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cummins Property Services, L.L.C. v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Colonial Village Ltd. v. Washington County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Accel, Inc. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- H.R. Options, Inc. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Elyria v. Lorain County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.