Legal Opinion

Moore Personnel Services, Inc. v. Zaino

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 2003No. 2002-0810PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Appellant, Tax Commissioner, assessed a sales tax against appellee, Moore Personnel Services, Inc. (“Moore”), for certain services it provided to some *338of its clients for the audit period January 1, 1994, to December 31, 1996. Moore had understandings, but no written contracts, with these clients that it would become the employer of persons designated by the clients. Moore did not interview or test the persons designated by the clients. The clients determined whom they wanted to work for them and sent those persons to Moore. The persons sent would fill out paperwork to become Moore…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ace Steel Baling, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. ConyersOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Crawford v. ChapmanOhio Supreme Court · 1848

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Roberts v. RMB Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Hilliard City Schools Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Abraitis v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Taylor v. Board of Trustees, Ca2008-02-032 (1-20-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. H.R. Options, Inc. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API