Legal Opinion

City of Elyria v. Lorain County Budget Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 2008No. Nos. 2006-2293, 2006-2389, and 2006-2390PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} In the three consolidated appeals before us, four political subdivisions in Lorain County- — the city of Elyria, the city of North Ridgeville, the city of Avon Lake, and Amherst Township — challenge the alternative method of apportionment that was used by the county budget commission to apportion certain funds set aside by the state for local governments for distribution years 2004, 2005, and 2006. A fifth subdivision, Lorain County Metropolitan Park District, was an appellant at the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”), but did not appeal to this court.

{¶ 2} Ohio law provides for the creation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dayton-Montgomery County Port Authority v. Montgomery County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Colonial Village Ltd. v. Washington County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. City of Painesville v. Lake County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Shawnee Township v. Allen County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. H.R. Options, Inc. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Worthington City Schools Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Crown Communication, Inc. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Gaston v. Medina County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Brown v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Cincinnati Golf Management, Inc. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API