Legal Opinion

Luke v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 2, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-0834PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Granting the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss. The plaintiff previously served as a Hospital Corpsman Second Class in the United States Navy. The defendant is the United States. The plaintiff brings suit against the United States alleging that the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces deprived him of a full and fair hearing, *and that his conviction was unconstitutional. The plaintiff claims that this court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Syneeda Lynn Penland v. Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Scott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Bergdahl v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
  4. Bond v. KendallDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
  5. Scott v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API