Legal Opinion

Frease v. Glazer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2000No. CC 9809-06647; SC S47016PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

In this tort action, the trial court granted plaintiffs motion to compel production for in camera review of defendant’s files relating to defendant’s legal representation of plaintiffs ex-husband, Torabi. Defendant objected to the motion on the grounds that the files were protected by the attorney-client privilege and that the materials in the files were defendant’s work product. The trial court ruled that: (1) defendant’s client had waived the attorney-client privilege by fleeing the jurisdiction and; (2) in any event, plaintiff had presented evidence sufficient to justify in camera review…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. State Ex Rel. Oregon Health Sciences University v. HaasOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. JancsekOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State Ex Rel. North Pacific Lumber Co. v. UnisOregon Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kahn v. Pony Express Courier Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. BrayOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. BrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. MAT, Inc. v. American Tower Asset Sub, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API