Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Board of Assessors
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided November 5, 2004No. 03-P-143PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.
We consider cross appeals by Clarence Peterson, Jr. (the taxpayer), and the board of assessors of Boston (the assessors) from a decision of the Appellate Tax Board (the board) acting on appeals by the taxpayer under the formal procedure, see G. L. c. 59, §§ 64, 65, regarding real estate tax assessments *429on real property at One Federal Street, Boston (the property), for the fiscal years 1997 through 2001.1 The taxpayer filed timely applications for abatement with respect to each year, all of the applications being denied by the assessors. The taxpayer then filed timely appeals with the board.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Commonwealth v. LaniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- New Boston Garden Corp. v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Canavan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rubin v. MurrayMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- Routhier v. KeenanMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008
- Turner v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2009