Legal Opinion

Rubin v. Murray

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 16, 2011No. 09-P-1676PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKatzmann, J.

The corporate defendant, Olympic Adhesives, Inc. (Olympic), and individual defendants John E. Murray, Jr., Stephen P. Hopkins, and Paul C. Ryan, controlling shareholders of Olympic,2 appeal from a Superior Court judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Merek Rubin, a minority shareholder and Olympic’s former corporate counsel — who had acquired stock in Olympic as partial payment for legal services rendered to the individual defendants — on his claim that the individual defendants paid themselves excessive compensation and deprived Rubin of his share in Olympic’s profits. Following a jury-waived…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Starr v. FordhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  5. Fishman v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Merrimack College v. KPMG LLPMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  2. Massachusetts Highway Department v. Perini Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  3. Selfridge v. JamaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  4. Weiler v. PortfolioScope, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  5. Halks v. KindleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API