Legal Opinion

Gross v. Gross

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 30, 1952PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

22 N.J. Super. 407 (1952)

92 A.2d 71

SYLVIA GROSS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

SOL GROSS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 20, 1952.

Decided October 30, 1952.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and FRANCIS.

Mr. Benjamin M. Ratner argued the cause for defendant-appellant and cross-respondent (Messrs. Ellenstein & Cooper attorneys).

Mr. Robert D. Grosman argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent and cross-appellant.

2Per curiam

These cross-appeals involve the allowance to the plaintiff-wife of $125 per week alimony and $1,000 counsel fee, pendente lite, by the advisory…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bonanno v. BonannoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Dietrick v. DietrickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
  3. Dinnebeil v. DinnebeilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  4. Acheson v. AchesonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
  5. Hebble v. HebbleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Khalaf v. KhalafSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  2. Friedman v. FriedmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Salvatore v. SalvatoreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  4. Cole v. ColeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  5. Stolov v. StolovNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API