Legal Opinion

People v. Pinkston

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 2003No. B159294PublishedCited by 23 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

*389Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

Steven Terrose Pinkston appeals the judgment entered after conviction by jury of evading an officer with willful disregard for the safety of persons and property, a felony, and evading arrest, a misdemeanor. (Veh. Code, §§ 2800.2, subd. (a), 2800.1, subd. (a).) The trial court sentenced Pinkston to a term of 25 years to life in state prison. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

1. Prosecution’s evidence.

The evidence introduced at trial established Pinkston’s involvement in two separate instances of evading a peace officer.

a. The September 14th incident.

On September 14,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Burg v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. RoderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People v. BransfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Nopring Paulino Penuliar v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Penuliar v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Nopring Paulino Penuliar v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. People v. MUTUMACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. People v. BurroughsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API