Legal Opinion
Penuliar v. Mukasey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 9, 2008No. 03-71578PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The Opinion filed April 22, 2008, slip op. 4219, 523 F.3d 963, is amended as follows:
1. At slip op. 4226-27, 523 F.3d at 967-68, replace the two paragraphs that begin
<“We have construed ... > and end <... sought to distinguish for height ened punishment and other crimes.” Id. > with <We have construed 18 U.S.C. § 16 as requiring more than mere negligent or reckless conduct. See Fernandez-Ruiz v. Gonzales, 466 F.3d 1121, 1130 (9th Cir.2006) (en banc) (“[N]either recklessness nor gross negligence is a sufficient mens rea to establish that a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Patricia Hart v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Fernandez-Ruiz v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Alejandro Rodriguez v. Timothy RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. VongxayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Young v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Restrepo v. Attorney General of USCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- United States v. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.