Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Anaconda Copper Mining Co. v. Clancy

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1904No. 2,043PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Application by the state, on the relation of the Anaconda Copper Mining Company, for a writ of prohibition against the Second judicial district court and William Clancy, judge thereof.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

On November 10, 1903, the governor of Montana issued his proclamation convening the Eighth legislative assembly in extraordinary session at the capital of the state on December 1, 1903. The purposes for which this assembly was convened are indicated in the preamble to the proclamation. After reciting the fact that a large number of iietitions had been addressed to him, ashing that the legislature be convened in extra session, the governor continues:

“Whereas, they (certain petitioners) further represent the desirability of general legislation by which the bias and prejudice of district judges…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ryan v. WestonMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. People ex rel. Smith v. Judge of the Twelfth DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  3. State ex rel. Toi v. FrenchMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. In re O'BrienMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Thebaut v. CanovaSupreme Court of Florida · 1867

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. HolmesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Reichert v. STATE EX REL. McCULLOCHMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. U'ren v. BagleyOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State ex rel. Schneider v. CunninghamMontana Supreme Court · 1909

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API