Legal Opinion
Barry v. Ratelle
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 3, 1997No. Civ. 97-1159-B (LSP)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
BREWSTER, District Judge.
On August 5, 1997, Defendants Ratelle, Crews, Armstrong, and Hunt, the four defendants in this action, filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff did not file an opposition brief to this motion. Upon due consideration of the moving papers and for the reasons stated below, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint. Plaintiff may amend his complaint by addressing the deficiencies discussed in this…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- MacArthur Rumbles v. Donald R. Hill Black and BeckettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Nichols v. LoganDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2004
- Gonzalez v. AhmedDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Cockcroft v. KirklandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Cooper v. GarciaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.