Legal Opinion

Shahram Seresht v. United States of America; and Does 1 to 10

District Court, C.D. California

Decided May 28, 2026No. 8:21-cv-01365Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAHRAM SERESHT, Case No. 8:21-cv-01365-SPG-ADS 11 Plaintiff, 12 POST TRIAL FINDINGS OF FACT v. 13 AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; and DOES 1 to 10, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Shahram Seresht (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against Defendant United 19 States of America (“Defendant”) asserting a single cause of action for negligence under the 20 Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”). (ECF No. 1 (“Complaint”)). From May 28 through 21 May 31, 2024, and on June 6, 2024, the matter was tried…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Capelouto v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Howell v. HAMILTON MEATS & PROVISIONS, INC.California Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Vasilenko v. Grace Family ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Leslie G. v. Perry & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Gabriel Espinoza-Gutierrez v. Richard C. Smith, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API