Legal Opinion
Gabriel Espinoza-Gutierrez v. Richard C. Smith, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 3, 1996No. 95-35409PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner Gabriel Espinoza-Gutierrez (“Espinoza”), an applicant for legalization under 8 U.S.C. § 1255a, appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Espinoza was put into exclusion proceedings while attempting to return from a four-day trip to Mexico because he had not received advance parole from the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) prior to his departure. The district court had jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(b). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we reverse and remand. Petitioner also appeals the district…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Douglas W. Schwenk v. James Hartford Steve Sinclair Robert Mitchell,opinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Marie Therese Halim Assa'ad v. United States Attorney General, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Federal Trade Commission v. Freecom Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Sokha Sun v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Immigration and Naturalization Service Robert Coleman, District Director of InsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Rony Perez-Guzman v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.