Legal Opinion
Consumers' Checkbook, Center for the Study of Services v. United States Department of Health & Human Services
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 22, 2007No. Civil Action 06-2201 (EGS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Consumer’s Checkbook/Center for the Study of Services (“CSS”) brings this case to require the federal government defendants to disclose documents responsive to plaintiffs Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) request and to prevent defendants from assessing fees for fulfilling this request. Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Upon consideration of the motions and supporting memoranda, the responses and replies thereto, the applicable law, and the entire record, the Court determines that plaintiff is…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- United States Department of Justice v. Tax AnalystsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Consumers' Checkbook, Center for the Study of Services v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Cause of Action v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Consumers' Checkbook, Center for the Study of Services v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Consumers' Checkbook, Center for the Study of Services v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Pfeiffer v. United States Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022