Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Consumers' Checkbook, Center for the Study of Services v. United States Department of Health & Human Services

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 30, 2009No. 07-5343Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRogers, Circuit Judge

In holding that Exemption 6 of the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6), is dispositive, Op. at 1056, the court has assessed a strong privacy interest for private physicians who receive Medicare reimbursements while ignoring the commanding public interest in disclosure of information that would enhance the public’s ability to evaluate how well the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) is performing its statutory duties under the Medicare program. As subjective evaluations should not affect the balancing of these interests, it is significant that two district…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  4. National Archives & Records Administration v. FavishSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. United States Department of Justice v. Tax AnalystsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API