Legal Opinion
Stein Double Cushion Tire Co. v. Wm. T. Fulton Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 28, 1913PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTalbot, J.
This suit was instituted by the appellant against the appellees to recover the sum of $2,202.64, and interest. The petition, omitting formal parts, is as follows: “Now comes the Stein Double Cushion Tire Company, a corporation with its principal office at Akron, Summit county, Ohio, hereinafter called plaintiff, complaining of William T. Fulton Company, a corporation of the state of Texas, with its principal office at Dallas, Dallas county, Texas, with William T. Fulton as president of said corporation, and the Southwestern Surety Insurance Company, a corporation incorporated under the laws…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Asher v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Fuqua, Hinkle & Davis v. Pabst Brewing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897
- Allen v. Tyson-Jones Buggy Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897
- Albertype Co. v. Gust Feist Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Falls Rubber Co. v. La FonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Charles M. Stieff, Inc. v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- City of Atlanta v. York Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. RobertsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. Stein Double Cushion Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.