Legal Opinion
Falls Rubber Co. v. La Fon
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided December 12, 1923No. 488-3884PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlanks, J.
This suit was originally instituted in the district court of McLennan county, Tex., fbr the Nineteenth judicial district, by Falls Rubber Company, an Ohio corporation, against W. E. La Fon, M. W. Cabiness, and T. F. Farmer. The action against La Fon was based on a balance due for merchandise furnished La Fon under his contract with the Falls Rubber Company, wherein the said Falls Rubber Company was to furnish La Fon merchandise for the conduct by him of a retail business at Waco, in McLennan county, Tex., and as against Farmer and Cabiness on a contract of guaranty. The defenses were a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining & Milling Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Asher v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- S. R. Smythe Co. v. Ft. Worth Glass & Sand Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Dossett v. Franklin Life Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Daily International Sales Corp. v. Eastman Whipstock, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
- Glass v. HoblitzelleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. RobertsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Ferguson Seed Farms, Inc. v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.