Legal Opinion
United States v. Stegman
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 24, 2003No. CR. CCB-97-0126PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BLAKE, District Judge.
The defendant, John Stegman, began serving a term of supervised release on September 21, 2001. In March 2002, Steg-man refused to comply with an order from his probation officer to submit a blood specimen pursuant to the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 14135 et seq. (“DNA Act” or the “Act”). Stegman now challenges the constitutionality of the DNA Act in a motion to dismiss a notice of violation of conditions of supervised release filed by his probation officer. For the reasons stated below, Stegman’s motion will be denied.
BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- State v. RainesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Johnson v. QuanderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Polston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Corcoran v. SessionsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.