Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Quander
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 21, 2005No. Civ.A. 04-448(RBW)PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
The plaintiff brings this action alleging that the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 14135b, (“the DNA Act”) and D.C.Code § 22-4151, which was enacted by the District of Columbia to implement in the District of Columbia the objectives of the DNA Act, violate the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution; the Ex Post Facto Clauses of Article 1, sections 9 and 10 of the Constitution; the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), '42 U.S.C. §§ 1320d to d-8; and the International…
2Cases cited90 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Acara v. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Agee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Rzayeva v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Runkle v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Wilson v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.