Legal Opinion
Erard v. Johnson
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 29, 2012No. Case No. 12-cv-13627PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (docket nos. 18 & 31) AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND/OR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (docket no. 12)
STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, District Judge.
Plaintiff Matt Erard filed his pro se complaint for declaratory and injunctive *788relief on August 15, 2012. He alleges that the state of Michigan’s ballot-qualification procedures are discriminatory and violate provisions of the United States and Michigan Constitutions. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction or…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Barrow v. City of Detroit Election CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Graveline v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- Ahrouch v. BoulakhrifDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2025
- Aoun v. DarnayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Boyd v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.