Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 23, 2003No. CA CR 02-849PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John F. Stroud, Jr., Chief Judge.

Upon the trial court’s denial of their prehearing motions to suppress, Diana Lancaster and Michael Kehn entered conditional pleas of guilty, pursuant to Rule 24.3 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure, to the offenses of manufacture of a controlled substance (marijuana), possession of marijuana with intent to deliver, and possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to deliver. They were each sentenced to five years’ probation; Lancaster was assessed a $2500 fine and Kehn was ordered to pay a $5000 fine. The cases were consolidated for purposes of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brenk v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. State v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. United States v. Larry VentlingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  4. Hollis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Jefferson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wagner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Nelson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Nelson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API